Who is eligible to file for an uncontested divorce in Seattle, Washington?

The laws regarding qualifying or meeting the residency requirements for filing an uncontested divorce in Seattle are governed by state statute.  Please see RCW 26.09.030 below.

In general, qualifying or being eligible to file for an uncontested divorce here in Washington simply requires that either you or your spouse be a "resident" of Washington State.  As a practical matter, being a "resident" of Washington State simply means living here in Washington with the intent of making it your home. 

Are there any specific time limits for how long a person must reside in Washington before being eligible to file for an uncontested divorce?  No.

What if either my spouse or I are in the military and are simply “stationed” in Washington?  Can I still file for an uncontested divorce in Washington State?  Yes.

When a party who (1) is a resident of this state, or (2) is a member of the armed forces and is stationed in this state, or (3) is married to a party who is a resident of this state or who is a member of the armed forces and is stationed in this state, petitions for a dissolution of marriage, and alleges that the marriage is irretrievably broken and when ninety days have elapsed since the petition was filed and from the date when service of summons was made upon the respondent or the first publication of summons was made, the court shall proceed as follows:

     (a) If the other party joins in the petition or does not deny that the marriage is irretrievably broken, the court shall enter a decree of dissolution.

     (b) If the other party alleges that the petitioner was induced to file the petition by fraud, or coercion, the court shall make a finding as to that allegation and, if it so finds shall dismiss the petition.

     (c) If the other party denies that the marriage is irretrievably broken the court shall consider all relevant factors, including the circumstances that gave rise to the filing of the petition and the prospects for reconciliation and shall:

     (i) Make a finding that the marriage is irretrievably broken and enter a decree of dissolution of the marriage; or

     (ii) At the request of either party or on its own motion, transfer the cause to the family court, refer them to another counseling service of their choice, and request a report back from the counseling service within sixty days, or continue the matter for not more than sixty days for hearing. If the cause is returned from the family court or at the adjourned hearing, the court shall:

     (A) Find that the parties have agreed to reconciliation and dismiss the petition; or

     (B) Find that the parties have not been reconciled, and that either party continues to allege that the marriage is irretrievably broken. When such facts are found, the court shall enter a decree of dissolution of the marriage.

     (d) If the petitioner requests the court to decree legal separation in lieu of dissolution, the court shall enter the decree in that form unless the other party objects and petitions for a decree of dissolution or declaration of invalidity.

     (e) In considering a petition for dissolution of marriage, a court shall not use a party's pregnancy as the sole basis for denying or delaying the entry of a decree of dissolution of marriage. Granting a decree of dissolution of marriage when a party is pregnant does not affect further proceedings under the uniform parentage act, chapter 26.26 RCW.

[2005 c 55 § 1; 1996 c 23 § 1; 1973 1st ex.s. c 157 § 3.]